For
the complete report refer to the following website: http://www.cga.state.ct.us/2003/olrdata/lab/rpt/2003-R-0759.htm
October 31, 2003 2003-R-0759
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH
MUNICIPAL AND
EDUCATION BINDING ARBITRATION
By: John Moran, Associate Analyst
You
asked how many municipal and education (teacher and school administrator)
collective bargaining contracts in the last three years (1) have been settled
and (2) how many were resolved through an arbitration award. Of the instances
where arbitration wage awards were granted, you also wanted to know whether any
pattern indicates if the town or the union are more
likely to win.
SUMMARY
This
report looks at three years of contracts arrived at under the Municipal
Employee Relations Act (MERA) and the Teacher Negotiation Act (TNA), the two
separate state laws that govern collective bargaining for these groups. In
general, a small percentage of contract negotiations were resolved by binding
arbitration awards for the period fiscal years 2000-01 to 2002-03:
·
Municipal contracts (which include non-certified employees of school
districts), 5. 4%, and
·
Teacher and school administrator contracts, 8. 6%.
For
this period, arbitration began for 737 municipal employee agreements under the
Municipal Employee Relations Act (MERA), but only 40 actually resulted in
arbitration awards. The rest resulted in negotiated agreements reached before
the arbitrators made a decision. Under the Teacher Negotiation Act (TNA) for
the same period, 302 contracts were settled, but only 26 came down to arbitration
awards. The rest were settled in negotiation, mediation, or through a
stipulated arbitration agreement (an agreement made during the arbitration
process, but before an award is made).
For
this period, arbitrators decided on 150 general wage increase issues (80 under
MERA and 70 under TNA). The decisions were virtually split with 76 accepting
the union's last best offer and 74 accepting the town or school board's offer.
The MERA cases were more likely to produce awards favoring the town or school
board than the TNA cases. Officials at the State Board of Mediation and
Arbitration, the body that administers the MERA mediation and arbitration
process, noted that most arbitration cases involve much more than just general
wage issues and examining wages alone may not provide a full picture, or even
the full financial impact, of a case. Other issues in these cases can include
employee health insurance contributions, pension benefits and contributions,
and longevity pay, plus an array of issues that may not have much of a
financial impact.
Data
for this report comes from reviewing arbitration cases at the State Board of
Mediation and Arbitration and from the State Department of Education's annual
listing of the settlement status of teacher and school administrator
negotiations and copies of awards on file at the department.
Please travel to the following website to
view the complete report: http://www.cga.state.ct.us/2003/olrdata/lab/rpt/2003-R-0759.htm